Skip to main content
Download PDF

Alteration of medial temporal lobe metabolism related to Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with lewy bodies

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 16, Article number: 89 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Association of medial temporal lobe (MTL) metabolism with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) has not been evaluated considering their mixed disease (MD).

Methods

131 patients with AD, 133 with DLB, 122 with MD, and 28 normal controls (NCs) underwent neuropsychological tests, assessments for parkinsonism, cognitive fluctuation (CF), and visual hallucinations (VH), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET to quantify MTL metabolism in the amygdala, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex. The effects of AD and DLB on MTL metabolism were evaluated using general linear models (GLMs). Associations between MTL metabolism, cognition, and clinical features were evaluated using GLMs or logistic regression models separately performed for the AD spectrum (NC + AD + MD), DLB spectrum (NC + DLB + MD), and disease groups (AD + DLB + MD). Covariates included age, sex, and education.

Results

AD was associated with hippocampal/entorhinal hypometabolism, whereas DLB was associated with relative amygdalar/hippocampal hypermetabolism. Relative MTL hypermetabolism was associated with lower attention/visuospatial/executive scores and severe parkinsonism in both the AD and DLB spectra and disease groups. Left hippocampal/entorhinal hypometabolism was associated with lower verbal memory scores, whereas right hippocampal hypometabolism was associated with lower visual memory scores in both the AD spectrum and disease groups. Relative MTL hypermetabolism was associated with an increased risk of CF and VH in the disease group, and relative amygdalar hypermetabolism was associated with an increased risk of VH in the DLB spectrum.

Conclusions

Entorhinal-hippocampal hypometabolism and relative amygdala-hippocampal hypermetabolism could be characteristics of AD- and DLB-related neurodegeneration, respectively.

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Lewy body disease (LBD) are the two most common neurodegenerative and pathological causes of dementia. Although mixed pathologies of AD and LBD are common in cognitively impaired patients on autopsy; [1, 2] precise antemortem diagnosis is not easy in the real world due to the interaction of the two diseases on clinical symptoms [2,3,4]. For example, co-occurring AD pathologies in LBD patients lower the presentation rate of core clinical features of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), including visual hallucinations (VH) and cognitive fluctuation (CF) [3, 4]. Moreover, although LBD pathologies are associated with parkinsonism and more severe cognitive and behavioral deterioration in AD patients, [5] the lack of validated biomarkers has lessened clinicians’ interest in LB-related clinical symptoms.

Limbic structures are vulnerable to both AD and LBD. Neurofibrillary tangles in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus are the cardinal neuropathological features of AD [6]. Limbic areas are also preferentially affected by Lewy bodies (LBs) in diffuse LBD, [7] and the amygdala is the most commonly affected by LB pathology in patients with AD [1, 8]. Brain metabolism on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET is regarded as a useful imaging biomarker for the differential diagnosis of dementia, [9] and focusing on limbic metabolism could provide useful information for the diagnosis of DLB and AD. Previous studies have shown that the medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures are locations of hypometabolism in patients with AD, while relative preservation of the MTL is the most consistent finding in DLB patients [10,11,12]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the effects of AD and DLB on MTL metabolism have not been elucidated while considering these two diseases simultaneously.

In this study, we investigated the effects of AD and DLB on the metabolism of the MTL structures, including the amygdala, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex. We also evaluated the association between MTL metabolism and cognitive dysfunction, as well as the core clinical features of DLB, including parkinsonism, CF, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD), and VH, separately in the AD and DLB spectra. We hypothesized that AD and DLB independently contribute to MTL metabolism with disease-specific patterns that are related, in turn, to disease-specific clinical manifestations.

Methods

Study participants

The study participants were 28 cognitively normal controls (NCs), 131 patients with AD, 133 patients with DLB, and 122 patients with mixed disease (MD)—having AD and DLB—recruited from the dementia clinic of Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, from January 2015 to November 2022. NCs were recruited from a previous independent study of healthy volunteers and did not have any subjective symptoms of cognitive impairment or a history of neurological or psychiatric illnesses. They had normal cognitive function according to the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) and detailed neuropsychological tests (described below). All participants underwent neuropsychological tests, Unified Parkinson’s disease motor scale (UPDRS) examination, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-flobetaben (FBB)-PET, and FDG-PET. All patients with DLB and MD additionally underwent 18F-fluorinated N-3 fluoropropyl-2-betacarboxy-methoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane (FP-CIT)-PET scans. Among the 131 patients with AD, 53 (40.5%) underwent FP-CITPET scans for research purpose, which showed preserved dopamine transporter uptake in the striatum. The clinical diagnoses of AD and DLB were based on the diagnostic guidelines of the 2011 National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association [13] and the fourth consensus report of the DLB consortium published in 2017 [3]. AD-related mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was based on the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroup guidelines, [14] while MCI with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) was based on the 2020 research criteria for MCI-LB [15]. Patients with AD who satisfied the diagnostic criteria for probable DLB were considered to have MD. The diagnoses of AD and DLB were further supported by biomarker evidence of amyloid β deposition and reduced dopamine transporter uptake in the striatum based on visual rating as well as quantitative analysis [16]. All patients with AD, all patients with MD, and 56 of 133 patients with DLB (42.1%) had significant cerebral amyloid-β deposition on FBB-PET confirmed by the quantitative analysis. Patients with DLB and MD showed abnormalities in dopamine transporter uptake on FP-CIT-PET. However, although these patients presented with cognitive impairment, parkinsonism, and DAT depletion, they were not considered to have DLB if they did not experience CF or VH. The NC participants had normal FBB-PET, FDG-PET, and FP-CIT-PET findings.

Neuropsychological evaluation and clinical assessment

All participants completed the standardized Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB), [17] which comprises tests for attention, language, visuospatial ability, memory, and frontal/executive function. Standardized z-scores were available for all tests, with scores after age- and education-level matching. We included the following tests in our analyses: the Korean version of the Boston Naming Test (K-BNT) for the language domain; the copying item of the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT) for the visuospatial domain; the immediate recall, 20-min delayed recall, and recognition items of the RCFT and the Seoul Verbal Learning Test (SVLT) for the memory domain; and the digit span backward, semantic and phonemic Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), and Stroop Color Test for the executive domain. The scores in each cognitive domain were classified as abnormal when they were > 1 standard deviation below the normal values.

Image acquisition and processing with MRI and PET

The participants were scanned using a Philips 3.0 T MRI scanner (Philips Achieva; Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) with a SENSE head coil (SENSE factor = 2). T1-weighted (T1w) MRI data were obtained using a three-dimensional T1w turbo-field echo sequence with these parameters: axial acquisition matrix, 224 × 224; reconstructed matrix, 256 × 256 with 170 slices; voxel size, 0.859 × 0.859 × 1 mm3; field of view, 220 mm; echo time, 4.6 ms; repetition time, 9.8 ms; and flip angle, 8°.

FDG- and FBB-PET scans were performed using the Discovery 600 system (General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The FDG-PET scans were acquired according to the following protocol: Approximately 4.1 MBq per kilogram of body weight of FDG was intravenously administered to the patients. After 60 min of uptake, the PET images were acquired for 15 min. For FBB, 300 MBq (8 mCi) was intravenously administered during the procedure. Ninety minutes after injection, images were acquired over a 20-minute session. The images were reconstructed using the ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm with four iterations and 32 subsets. A Gaussian filter with a 4-mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) kernel was applied to the reconstructed PET images, yielding a 256 × 256 matrix with 0.98-mm pixels and 0.98-mm slice thickness.

Image processing methods

The FMRIB Software Library (FSL, http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) and Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) were used for T1-weighted and PET image processing. Each subject’s T1-weighted images were corrected for intensity inhomogeneity, skull-stripped, and registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template. The tissues in the registered images were classified into white matter, gray matter (GM), or cerebrospinal fluid based on the hidden-Markov random field model and the associated expectation-maximization algorithm [18]. GM probability map obtained from this algorithm was non-linearly transformed into the MNI template. The volume of interest (VOI) in the amygdala and hippocampus was segmented based on parameterized deformable surface meshes using T1-weighted MRI and the FSL FIRST algorithm [19]. The striatal regions of interest were included in the GM class. Then, we generated a study-specific GM mask by averaging all the individual GM probability maps and binarizing the average map (> 30% GM probability), and then assigned each voxel into either background or foreground. The entorhinal cortex VOI was defined as the anterior part of the parahippocampal gyrus based on the voxel coordinates, according to the automated anatomical labeling atlas (version 3) [20], by employing the highly deformable registration algorithm implemented in the ANTs software [21].

FDGPET scans were coregistered to individual T1w images, spatially normalized to the MNI template, and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) maps of the images were generated, using the cerebellar gray matter as the reference region. The FDG-SUVR maps weresmoothed using a 6 mm FWHM Gaussian kernel and reshaped into a voxel by subject matrix within the study-specific GM mask. We transformed each data into logarithmic form and centered the data matrix by subtracting each subject mean and group mean voxel profile, resulting in a residual image, termed as the subject residual profile (SRP) that highlight deviations based on the subject and voxel group means [22]. Finally, we extracted the median FDGSRP from the VOIs.

The global amyloid burden was measured using an automated FBB-PET quantification pipeline as described elsewhere [23]. Global SUVR values for FBBPET were extracted as the cortical volume-weighted average of these cortical regions of interest: frontal, anterior/posterior cingulate, lateral parietal, and lateral temporal cortices [23]. We classified the participants as β-amyloid positive and negative applying a global FBB-SUVR cutoff value of 1.478 [24].

Quality assurance for image processing

All MRI and PET images and preprocessing outcomes from the automated pipelines were visually inspected for quality assurance by three researchers (SWK, SJ, and BSY) who were blinded to the participant information.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses of demographic and clinical data were performed using R statistical software (version 4.2.1). Analyses of variance and χ2 tests were performed to compare the clinical features between the disease and control groups. To compare the quantitatively measured MTL metabolism among the NC, AD, DLB, and MD groups, general linear models (GLMs) were used. To identify the independent and interaction effects of AD and DLB on MTL metabolism, we used GLMs. Interaction effects were included only if they were significant. We evaluated the effects of MTL metabolism on standardized neuropsychological z-scores and the UPDRS motor score in a combined group of patients with AD, MD, and NC (AD spectrum); a combined group of patients with DLB, MD, and NC (DLB spectrum); and a combined group of patients with AD, DLB, and MD (disease group) using GLMs. To determine the association between MTL metabolism and the risk of CF, RBD, and VH, logistic regression analyses were performed. All GLMs and logistic regression models were adjusted for age, sex, and educational level.

To explore the heterogeneity of the associations between MTL metabolism and clinical features within each disease group, sensitivity analyses were conducted in the AD, DLB, and MD group, separately.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristic of the study participants

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1. Compared with the NC group, all disease groups were older and had a shorter duration of education. The proportion of female patients in the DLB group was lower than in the MD group. Compared with the NC group, all disease groups had lower mean K-MMSE scores and higher clinical dementia rating (CDR). The proportion of patients with dementia in the AD group was comparable to that in the DLB group. The proportion of patients with dementia was higher in the MD group than that in the AD and DLB groups. The MD group had lower mean K-MMSE scores and higher CDR than the AD and DLB groups. All disease groups had higher mean UPDRS motor scores than the NC group, and the MD group had higher mean UPDRS motor scores than the AD group. The NC and AD groups did not exhibit any CF or VH. The DLB and MD groups had a higher proportion of CF and VH than the NC and AD groups.

Table 1 Comparison of demographic data among the NC, AD, DLB, MD groups
Full size table

Comparison of MTL metabolism

Compared with the NC group, the AD group had a lower mean metabolism in the left hippocampus, whereas the DLB and MD groups had a higher mean metabolism in the right amygdala (Fig. 1). The DLB group had higher mean metabolism than the AD group in all MTL regions. The MD group had higher mean metabolism in the bilateral amygdala and hippocampus than the AD group, whereas the MD group had lower mean metabolism in the bilateral entorhinal cortex and right hippocampus than the DLB group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Group comparisons of metabolism in the MTL of the study groups. The data show the distribution of the z-transformed residuals in each group from the general linear models for MTL metabolism after controlling for age, sex, and education. P-values were obtained after correcting for multiple comparisons across 36 tests (6 MTL regions by 6 tests) with false discovery rate methods (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001). Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; MD, mixed disease; MTL, medial temporal lobe; NC, normal control

Full size image

Effects of the presence of AD and DLB on MTL metabolism

There was no significant interaction effect between AD and DLB on the metabolism of each MTL region (data not shown); therefore, the independent effects of AD and DLB on MTL metabolism were evaluated (Table 2). AD was associated with decreased metabolism in the left hippocampus, right hippocampus, left entorhinal cortex, and right entorhinal cortex. Contrastingly, the presence of DLB was associated with increased metabolism in the left amygdala, right amygdala, left hippocampus, right hippocampus, and right entorhinal cortex. Figure 2 shows representative images of a patient with NC showing normal entorhinal metabolism (Fig. 2A), a patient with AD showing entorhinal hypometabolism (Fig. 2B), a patient with DLB showing relative hippocampal hypermetabolism (Fig. 2C), and a patient with MD showing relative amygdalar and hippocampal hypermetabolism (Fig. 2D).

Table 2 Independent effect of AD and DLB on MTL metabolism
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative examples of MTL metabolic changes in each group. (A) An NC participant with preserved metabolism in the bilateral entorhinal cortex (black arrows). (B) patient with AD with progressive memory impairment exhibiting decreased metabolism in the bilateral entorhinal cortex (black arrows). (C) A patient with DLB with cognitive fluctuations and parkinsonism who exhibit bilateral relative hippocampal hypermetabolism (orange arrows). (D) MD patient with visual hallucinations and parkinsonism who exhibits bilateral relative amygdala hypermetabolism with an emphasis on the left side (red arrows) and left relative hippocampal hypermetabolism (orange arrow). Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; MD, mixed disease; MTL, medial temporal lobe; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NC, normal control; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale

Full size image

Association of MTL metabolism and cognition

Table 3 shows the univariable GLMs for neuropsychological test z-scores separately performed in the AD spectrum, DLB spectrum, and disease groups. In the AD spectrum, hypometabolism in the left hippocampus and left entorhinal cortex was associated with lower SVLT delayed recall scores, whereas hypometabolism in the right hippocampus was associated with lower RCFT delayed recall scores. Relative hypermetabolism in all MTL regions was associated with lower RCFT copy scores, and relative hypermetabolism in the bilateral amygdala was associated with lower scores on the COWAT semantic, COWAT phonemic, and Stroop color reading tests. Relative hypermetabolism in the right hippocampus was also associated with lower COWAT phonemic scores, whereas relative hypermetabolism in the right entorhinal cortex was also associated with lower scores on the COWAT phonemic and Stroop color reading tests.

Table 3 Association of MTL metabolism with standardized cognitive function scores
Full size table

In the DLB spectrum, relative hypermetabolism in all MTL regions was associated with lower scores on the digit span backward, RCFT copy, COWAT phonemic, and Stroop color reading tests. Relative hypermetabolism in the bilateral amygdala was also associated with lower scores on the K-BNT, COWAT semantics, immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition items of the RCFT. Relative hypermetabolism in the right amygdala was further associated with lower scores on the immediate and delayed recall items of the SVLT, whereas relative hypermetabolism in the right hippocampus and entorhinal cortex was also associated with lower scores on the K-BNT, COWAT semantic, and immediate recall items of the SVLT. In contrast to other MTL regions, hypometabolism in the left hippocampus and left entorhinal cortex was associated with lower SVLT recognition scores.

In the disease group, hypometabolism in the left hippocampus and left entorhinal cortex was associated with lower SVLT delayed recall and recognition scores. Hypometabolism in the right hippocampus was associated with lower RCFT delayed recall and recognition scores, while hypometabolism in the right entorhinal cortex was associated with lower SVLT recognition and RCFT delayed recall scores. Contrastingly, relative hypermetabolism in all MTL regions was associated with lower scores on the digit span backward, RCFT copy, phonemic COWAT, and Stroop color reading tests. Relative hypermetabolism in the bilateral amygdala was additionally associated with lower K-BNT and COWAT semantic scores, and relative hypermetabolism in the right amygdala was also associated with lower SVLT immediate recall scores. Relative hypermetabolism in the left hippocampus was also associated with lower COWAT semantic scores, and relative hypermetabolism in the right hippocampus was further associated with lower K-BNT and COWAT semantic scores. Relative hypermetabolism in the right entorhinal cortex was also associated with lower K-BNT, SVLT immediate recall, and COWAT semantic scores.

Association of MTL metabolism and parkinsonism

Relative hypermetabolism in all the MTL regions was associated with higher UPDRS motor scores in the AD and DLB spectra, and disease groups (Table 4). Among the MTL regions, the right amygdala had the largest effect size for the AD and DLB spectra, whereas the left amygdala had the largest effect size for the disease group.

Table 4 Association of MTL metabolism with UPDRS motor score
Full size table

Association of MTL metabolism and DLB core features including CF, RBD, and VH

The results of the univariable logistic regression analyses for DLB core features, including CF, RBD, and VH, are presented in Table 5. On the AD spectrum, MTL metabolism was not associated with the risk of CF, RBD, or VH. In the DLB spectrum, relative hypermetabolism in the bilateral amygdala was associated with the risk of VH. In the disease group, relative hypermetabolism in all MTL regions was associated with the risk of CF and VH.

Table 5 Association of MTL metabolism with cognitive fluctuation, RBD, and visual hallucinations
Full size table

Sensitivity analysis

The associations of MTL metabolism with cognition (Supplementary Table 1) and DLB core features (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3) were analyzed in the AD, DLB, and MD group, separately. Overall results in the sensitivity analyses were very similar to the original results.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the effects of AD and DLB on MTL metabolism and the association between MTL metabolism and clinical features in the spectrum of normal aging and cognitive impairment due to AD, DLB, and MD. Our major findings were as follows. First, the presence of AD was independently associated with hypometabolism in the bilateral hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, whereas the presence of DLB was associated with relative hypermetabolism in the bilateral amygdala, hippocampus, and right entorhinal cortex. Second, left hippocampal/entorhinal hypometabolism was associated with verbal memory dysfunction, whereas right hippocampal hypometabolism was associated with visual memory dysfunction in both the AD spectrum and disease groups. Third, relative MTL hypermetabolism, especially in the amygdala, was associated with attention, visuospatial, and executive dysfunction, in addition to more severe motor parkinsonism in both the AD and DLB spectra, as well as in the disease group. Fourth, relative MTL hypermetabolism was associated with an increased risk of CF and VH in the disease group, and relative amygdala hypermetabolism was associated with an increased risk of VH in the DLB spectrum. Collectively, our results suggest that entorhinal/hippocampal hypometabolism and relative amygdalar/hippocampal hypermetabolism reflect AD- and DLB-related neurodegeneration, respectively.

The first major finding of this study was that AD was independently associated with MTL hypometabolism, whereas DLB was independently associated with relative MTL hypermetabolism. The contrasting effects of these two diseases on MTL metabolism compete in the hippocampus, whereas the effect of AD prevails in the entorhinal cortex, especially on the left side, and that of DLB in the amygdala, especially on the right side. Our results are generally in line with previous studies on AD showing decreased MTL metabolism in the amygdala, [25] hippocampus, [25, 26] and entorhinal cortex [27, 28]. Studies on DLB, [29] Parkinson’s disease (PD), [30] and even patients with RBD with later clinical progression to PD or DLB, [31] reported increased metabolism in the MTL. Although there are discrepant results showing preserved hippocampal metabolism in AD patients, [32, 33] and relatively preserved rather than increased MTL metabolism in DLB patients, [10,11,12] prevalent mixed pathologies and competing effects of AD and DLB on MTL metabolism could explain these discrepancies. For example, if patients with AD have concomitant DLB, the hippocampal metabolism may be preserved rather than reduced. Conversely, if patients with DLB have concomitant AD, the average MTL metabolism may be preserved rather than increased.

Our second major finding was that left hippocampal/entorhinal hypometabolism was associated with verbal memory dysfunction, whereas right hippocampal hypometabolism was associated with visual memory dysfunction, in both the AD spectrum and disease groups. These results are consistent with previous unilateral MTL lesions or epilepsy studies showing that left lesions impair verbal memory and right lesions impair non-verbal [34] or visual memory [35]. Considering that memory impairment is the cognitive hallmark of AD and that the burdens of neurofibrillary tangles in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus are associated with memory impairment in AD, [36, 37] hippocampal/entorhinal hypometabolism could be a disease monitoring or staging biomarker for AD from healthy aging to dementia, even in patients with mixed pathologies.

Our third major finding was that relative MTL hypermetabolism, especially in the amygdala, was associated with attention, visuospatial, and executive dysfunction, as well as more severe motor parkinsonism, in both the AD and DLB spectra, as well as in the disease group. Attention, visuospatial, and executive dysfunction are cognitive hallmarks of DLB, [38] and motor parkinsonism is a core clinical feature of DLB [3]. As limbic LB pathologies is related to visuospatial and executive dysfunction in patients with DLB [39] and PD, [40] our results suggest that relative MTL hypermetabolism could be a disease monitoring biomarker for DLB, reflecting the severity of LB pathologies. Although previous studies have shown that limbic hypermetabolism correlates with dopaminergic depletion in patients with DLB [41, 42] and RBD, [31] we could not evaluate the relationship between relative MTL hypermetabolism, dopamine transporter uptake, cognitive dysfunction, and motor parkinsonism because some of our patients with AD did not undergo FP-CIT-PET. Further studies are needed to elucidate these relationships.

Our last major finding was that relative MTL hypermetabolism was associated with an increased risk of CF and VH in the disease group, and relative amygdala hypermetabolism was associated with an increased risk of VH in the DLB spectrum. There are controversies regarding whether hypermetabolism in DLB represents a disinhibition or compensatory mechanism [41]. Although recruitment of brain function to compensate for functional loss may present as hypermetabolism, just as findings observed in the early disease stage of AD, [43] the compensatory processes cannot be maintained in the late disease stage once neurodegeneration has progressed to some extent. Additionally, these compensatory mechanisms should be directed towards alleviating the clinical symptoms of degenerative diseases. In this study, relative MTL hypermetabolism was associated with the worsening of cognitive dysfunction, parkinsonism, and even VH and CF, which are regarded as specific to DLB [3]. Therefore, our results support the conjecture that relative MTL hypermetabolism represents a disinhibitory process rather than a compensatory process. The candidates for explaining such disinhibitory processes include the lack of inhibitory neurotransmitter input from the brainstem nucleus to the limbic system, [44] disinhibition of the basal ganglia [45] or cerebellar pacemaker [46] that are connected to the limbic system, [47] and abnormal neuronal hyperexcitability caused by neuronal accumulation of α-synuclein [48]. Although a previous study showed that VHs are related to LB pathology within the amygdala and parahippocampus, [49] future studies are warranted to confirm the exact underlying mechanism for metabolic perturbation in MTL structures.

Strengths and limitations

This study has several strengths. The diagnoses of AD and DLB were carefully made, satisfying the recently revised diagnostic criteria, and were supported by abnormal results on FBB- and FP-CIT-PET, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the independent effects of both AD and DLB on MTL metabolism. However, this study also has several limitations. First, the underlying causes of neurodegeneration were not confirmed by pathological examinations. Second, the cross-sectional design limited the interpretation of causal and temporal relationships. Third, the single-center setting of this study may have introduced a selection bias. Fourth, there may be a reference issue in the measurement of regional metabolism from FDG-PET. Although we used the SRP methods which is similar to the global normalization method, the pons and cerebellum were more frequently used as reference regions. However, as metabolism in the pons, cerebellum, and motor cortex is increased in patients with LBD, [42] using such regions as reference regions could overestimate the degree of hypometabolism and underestimate the degree of hypermetabolism, which was significantly associated with the core clinical features of DLB in our study. Sensitivity analyses using global normalized SUVR instead of SRP showed very similar results to the original results (Supplementary Tables 4–11). In contrast, sensitivity analyses using pons-normalized SUVR successfully captured the association between MTL hypometabolism and AD-related clinical features, such as memory dysfunction, but failed to capture the association between MTL hypermetabolism and DLB-related clinical features, including parkinsonism, CF, RBD, or VH. Notably, the sensitivity analyses to determine the independent effects of AD and DLB on regional metabolism and those to determine the association between MTL metabolism and DLB-related clinical features consistently showed that the models using globally normalized MTL metabolism had lower Akaike information criteria values than those using pons-normalized MTL metabolism. Global normalization or SRP methods may have better power to accurately detect DLB-related neurodegeneration without missing AD-related neurodegeneration. Fifth, as the MTL system is closely connected to other brain regions, metabolic alterations in related structures could confound the effects of MTL metabolism. Considering that the limbic area is rarely involved in vascular lesions, [50] MTL metabolism can capture the pathological burden more precisely than other cortical or subcortical metabolic pathways, which are vulnerable to vascular pathology. Sixth, validation in an independent sample is necessary to confirm our findings. Recently, we investigated in 62 autopsy-confirmed patients with AD and/or LBD pathologies using the AD Neuroimaging Initiative database. The previous study showed that AD pathology was associated with hypometabolism in the bilateral hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex regardless of LBD pathology, whereas LBD pathology was associated with relative hypermetabolism in the bilateral putamen and anterior cingulate cortex regardless of AD pathology, [51] demonstrating robustness of the results in the current study. Seventh, our results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and younger age of the NC group in comparison to the disease groups. However, the sensitivity analyses of the 12 NC subjects who were not statistically different in age from the disease groups showed almost the same results as the original results (data are not shown). Further studies are needed to replicate our results using NCs with a sufficient sample size and age comparable to the disease groups.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that there are AD- and DLB-specific patterns of MTL metabolism. MTL metabolism on FDG-PET may be a useful biomarker for the detection and monitoring of cognitive impairment due to AD and DLB.

Data availability

To replicate the procedures and results, any qualified investigator can request anonymized data after obtaining ethics clearance and approval from all authors.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

CDR:

Clinical dementia rating

CF:

Cognitive fluctuation

COWAT:

Controlled oral word association test

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

DLB:

Dementia with Lewy bodies

FBB:

18F-flobetaben

FDG:

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose

GLMs:

General linear models

GM:

Gray matter

K-BNT:

Korean version of the Boston naming test

K-MMSE:

Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination

LBs:

Lewy bodies

LBD:

Lewy body disease

NCs:

Normal controls

MD:

Mixed disease

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MTL:

Medial temporal lobe

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

RCFT:

Rey–Osterrieth complex figure test

RBD:

Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder

SNSB:

Seoul neuropsychological screening battery

SRP:

Subject residual profile

SUVR:

Standardized uptake value ratio

SVLT:

Seoul verbal learning test

UPDRS:

Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale

VH:

Visual hallucination

References

  1. Hamilton RL. Lewy bodies in Alzheimer’s disease: a neuropathological review of 145 cases using alpha-synuclein immunohistochemistry. Brain Pathol. 2000;10(3):378–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Irwin DJ, Grossman M, Weintraub D, Hurtig HI, Duda JE, Xie SX, et al. Neuropathological and genetic correlates of survival and dementia onset in synucleinopathies: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(1):55–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Halliday G, Taylor JP, Weintraub D, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2017;89(1):88–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Coughlin DG, Hurtig HI, Irwin DJ. Pathological influences on clinical heterogeneity in Lewy Body Diseases. Mov Disord. 2020;35(1):5–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung EJ, Babulal GM, Monsell SE, Cairns NJ, Roe CM, Morris JC. Clinical features of Alzheimer Disease with and without Lewy Bodies. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(7):789–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Braak H, Braak E. Staging of Alzheimer’s disease-related neurofibrillary changes. Neurobiol Aging. 1995;16(3):271–8. discussion 8–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rezaie P, Cairns NJ, Chadwick A, Lantos PL. Lewy bodies are located preferentially in limbic areas in diffuse Lewy body disease. Neurosci Lett. 1996;212(2):111–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson PT, Abner EL, Patel E, Anderson S, Wilcock DM, Kryscio RJ, et al. The Amygdala as a locus of pathologic misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2018;77(1):2–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nestor PJ, Altomare D, Festari C, Drzezga A, Rivolta J, Walker Z, et al. Clinical utility of FDG-PET for the differential diagnosis among the main forms of dementia. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(9):1509–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mak E, Su L, Williams GB, O’Brien JT. Neuroimaging characteristics of dementia with Lewy bodies. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(2):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pillai JA, Wu G, Tousi B, Larvie M, Léger GC, Leverenz JB. Amygdala sign, a FDG-PET signature of dementia with Lewy Bodies. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;64:300–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kantarci K, Boeve BF, Przybelski SA, Lesnick TG, Chen Q, Fields J, et al. FDG PET metabolic signatures distinguishing prodromal DLB and prodromal AD. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2021;31:102754.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr., Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McKeith IG, Ferman TJ, Thomas AJ, Blanc F, Boeve BF, Fujishiro H, et al. Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology. 2020;94(17):743–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee YG, Jeon S, Kang SW, Ye BS. Effects of amyloid beta and dopaminergic depletion on perfusion and clinical symptoms. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(12):5719–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang Y, Na D. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB): Human Brain Research & Consulting Co. In: Incheon; 2003.

  18. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(1):45–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patenaude B, Smith SM, Kennedy DN, Jenkinson M. A bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. NeuroImage. 2011;56(3):907–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rolls ET, Huang CC, Lin CP, Feng J, Joliot M. Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. NeuroImage. 2020;206:116189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage. 2011;54(3):2033–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moeller JR, Strother SC. A Regional Covariance Approach to the analysis of functional patterns in Positron Emission Tomographic Data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabolism. 1991;11(1suppl):A121–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee YG, Jeon S, Yoo HS, Chung SJ, Lee SK, Lee PH, et al. Amyloid-beta-related and unrelated cortical thinning in dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;72:32–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sabri O, Sabbagh MN, Seibyl J, Barthel H, Akatsu H, Ouchi Y, et al. Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: phase 3 study. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(8):964–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nestor PJ, Fryer TD, Smielewski P, Hodges JR. Limbic hypometabolism in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2003;54(3):343–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mosconi L, Tsui WH, De Santi S, Li J, Rusinek H, Convit A, et al. Reduced hippocampal metabolism in MCI and AD: automated FDG-PET image analysis. Neurology. 2005;64(11):1860–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Karow DS, McEvoy LK, Fennema-Notestine C, Hagler DJ Jr., Jennings RG, Brewer JB, et al. Relative capability of MR imaging and FDG PET to depict changes associated with prodromal and early Alzheimer disease. Radiology. 2010;256(3):932–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Walhovd KB, Fjell AM, Brewer J, McEvoy LK, Fennema-Notestine C, Hagler DJ Jr., et al. Combining MR imaging, positron-emission tomography, and CSF biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(2):347–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ye BS, Lee S, Yoo H, Chung SJ, Lee YH, Choi Y, et al. Distinguishing between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease using metabolic patterns. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;87:11–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang C, Ravdin LD, Nirenberg MJ, Piboolnurak P, Severt L, Maniscalco JS, et al. Neuroimaging markers of motor and nonmotor features of Parkinson’s disease: an 18f fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;35(3–4):183–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Diaz-Galvan P, Miyagawa T, Przybelski SA, Lesnick TG, Senjem ML, Jack CR, et al. Brain glucose metabolism and nigrostriatal degeneration in isolated rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder. Brain Commun. 2023;5(1):fcad021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ishii K, Sasaki M, Yamaji S, Sakamoto S, Kitagaki H, Mori E. Relatively preserved hippocampal glucose metabolism in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1998;9(6):317–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ishii K, Sasaki H, Kono AK, Miyamoto N, Fukuda T, Mori E. Comparison of gray matter and metabolic reduction in mild Alzheimer’s disease using FDG-PET and voxel-based morphometric MR studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32(8):959–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Milner B. BMemory and the medial temporal regions of the brain,[in Biology of memory, KH Pribram and DE Broadbent. Eds. New York: Academic; 1970. pp. 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bonelli SB, Powell RHW, Yogarajah M, Samson RS, Symms MR, Thompson PJ, et al. Imaging memory in temporal lobe epilepsy: predicting the effects of temporal lobe resection. Brain. 2010;133(4):1186–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Nagy Z, Jobst KA, Esiri MM, Morris JH, King EM, MacDonald B, et al. Hippocampal pathology reflects memory deficit and brain imaging measurements in Alzheimer’s disease: clinicopathologic correlations using three sets of pathologic diagnostic criteria. Dementia. 1996;7(2):76–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Reitz C, Honig L, Vonsattel JP, Tang MX, Mayeux R. Memory performance is related to amyloid and tau pathology in the hippocampus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(7):715–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kang S, Yoon SH, Na HK, Lee Y-g, Jeon S, Baik K et al. Neuropsychological comparison of patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies. J Clin Neurol. 2023;19.

  39. Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Yu L, Boyle PA, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA. Cognitive impairment, decline and fluctuations in older community-dwelling subjects with Lewy bodies. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 10):3005–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. El-Nazer R, Adler CH, Beach TG, Belden CM, Artz J, Shill HA, et al. Regional neuropathology distribution and verbal fluency impairments in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;65:73–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Huber M, Beyer L, Prix C, Schönecker S, Palleis C, Rauchmann BS, et al. Metabolic correlates of dopaminergic loss in dementia with Lewy Bodies. Mov Disord. 2020;35(4):595–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kang SW, Jeon S, Lee Y-g, Park M, Baik K, Jung JH, et al. Implication of metabolic and dopamine transporter PET in dementia with Lewy bodies. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Celone KA, Calhoun VD, Dickerson BC, Atri A, Chua EF, Miller SL, et al. Alterations in memory networks in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: an independent component analysis. J Neurosci. 2006;26(40):10222–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Li S, Varga V, Sik A, Kocsis B. GABAergic control of the ascending input from the median raphe nucleus to the limbic system. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94(4):2561–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Plenz D, Kital ST. A basal ganglia pacemaker formed by the subthalamic nucleus and external Globus Pallidus. Nature. 1999;400(6745):677–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mouginot D, Gähwiler BH. Characterization of synaptic connections between cortex and deep nuclei of the rat cerebellum in vitro. Neuroscience. 1995;64(3):699–712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Blatt GJ, Oblak AL, Schmahmann JD. Cerebellar connections with limbic circuits: anatomy and functional implications. In: Manto M, Schmahmann JD, Rossi F, Gruol DL, Koibuchi N, editors. Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar disorders. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013. pp. 479–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Morris M, Sanchez PE, Verret L, Beagle AJ, Guo W, Dubal D, et al. Network dysfunction in alpha-synuclein transgenic mice and human Lewy body dementia. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2(11):1012–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Harding AJ, Stimson E, Henderson JM, Halliday GM. Clinical correlates of selective pathology in the amygdala of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 11):2431–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shaw CM, Alvord EC. Jr. Neuropathology of the limbic system. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1997;7(1):101–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee Y-g, Jeon S, Park M, Kang SW, Yoon SH, Baik K, et al. Effects of Alzheimer and Lewy Body Disease pathologies on Brain Metabolism. Ann Neurol. 2022;91(6):853–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all of the participants in this study.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HR22C141101), and by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: 1711196790, RS-2023-00247272), and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2022R1C1C2011227).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sungwoo Kang and Seun Jeon contributed equally to the manuscript.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea

    Sungwoo Kang & Byoung Seok Ye

  2. Metabolism-Dementia Research Institute , Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Seun Jeon

  3. Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea

    Young-gun Lee

Authors
  1. Sungwoo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seun Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Young-gun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Byoung Seok Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization and design of the study: S.K. and B.S.Y. Drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content: S.K., S.J., B.S.Y. Major role in the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: S.K., Y-g.L., S.J., B.S.Y. Statistical analysis: S.K., S.J., B.S.Y. Supervision: B.S.Y. Critical review of the manuscript and approval of the final version: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byoung Seok Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Medical Center (4-2022-1029). The need for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing intertest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, S., Jeon, S., Lee, Yg. et al. Alteration of medial temporal lobe metabolism related to Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with lewy bodies. Alz Res Therapy 16, 89 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13195-024-01429-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13195-024-01429-4

Keywords

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193